Bokken History
               
              The sword that seem to have been in general use
                during the Jokoto period (prior to 800 AD) are of the strait type,
                single or double edged and poorly tempered. There seems to be
                no standard design, they vary between two and four feet in length,
                and their common feature is the fact that they are all slung from
                the waist by cords, and used with a stabbing action. Historical
                evidence suggest that they were made by Chinese and Korean smiths
                working in Japan, as well as native artisans.
              It is generally agreed that the firs swords of the
                type that became the standard weapon of the Samurai, were made
                by the smith Amakuni at some time during the 8th century AD. The
                adoption of the efficient curved edge was a massive step forward
                in the weapon technology of the period, which coupled with the
                improvements in tempering techniques, culminated seven centuries
                later in the golden age of swordmaking between 1394 and 1427 when
                swords of a quality rarely equaled, and never surpassed, were
                made.
               However,
                when massed infantry engagements replaced the mounted cavalry
                skirmishes of previous ages, the heavy Tachi type sword worn edge
                downwards as best suited the mounted warrior, who drew his sword
                with a distinct upward movement to clear it from its scabbard
                and avoid cutting his mount, was replaced by the shorter lighter
                Katana, worn edge upwards, and thrust through the sash. This seemingly
                insignificant modification in the manner in which the sword was
                worn, was in fact the beginning of an entirely new method of combat
                that would have a dramatic effect on the way future generation
                of Samurai waged war. With the sword firmly secured in the waist
                band edge up, the Samurai could draw and cut forwards in one rapid
                movement, and thereby defend himself without the need to first
                draw the sword and adopt an offensive posture. From this time
                onwards, Kenjutsu (the use of already drawn sword) and Batto-jutsu
                (drawing and simultaneously cutting with the sword) became separate
                but parallel disciplines, and recognizable systems or schools
                were established for both.
However,
                when massed infantry engagements replaced the mounted cavalry
                skirmishes of previous ages, the heavy Tachi type sword worn edge
                downwards as best suited the mounted warrior, who drew his sword
                with a distinct upward movement to clear it from its scabbard
                and avoid cutting his mount, was replaced by the shorter lighter
                Katana, worn edge upwards, and thrust through the sash. This seemingly
                insignificant modification in the manner in which the sword was
                worn, was in fact the beginning of an entirely new method of combat
                that would have a dramatic effect on the way future generation
                of Samurai waged war. With the sword firmly secured in the waist
                band edge up, the Samurai could draw and cut forwards in one rapid
                movement, and thereby defend himself without the need to first
                draw the sword and adopt an offensive posture. From this time
                onwards, Kenjutsu (the use of already drawn sword) and Batto-jutsu
                (drawing and simultaneously cutting with the sword) became separate
                but parallel disciplines, and recognizable systems or schools
                were established for both.
              During the Sengoku Jidai, the absence of a strong
                central government and the subsequent power vacuum, encouraged
                the provincial warlords to fight among themselves in continuous
                and bloody attempts to enlarge their respective territories, and
                thus their wealth. The demand for weapons was insatiable, and
                to fill it smiths literally began mass-producing inferior weapons
                by using for the first time, steel purchased from a central source,
                and new, much faster forging methods that speeded up production
                at the expense of quality.
              Where previously a smith would make his own steel
                from iron sand or ore, then with great care forge and temper a
                fine blade, now ready made, sometimes imported steel would be
                overheated to facilitate quick forging. The resultant sword while
                beautiful in appearance, would lack the strength and sharpened
                of earlier weapons, an example of a pretty face hiding a worthless
                heart. The true beauty of a sword is in its sharpness, strength
                and the appearance, only when these three elements are combined
                into a weapon that will perform well in the hands of swordsman,
                can it be called beautiful. Swords that chip as soon as they contact
                a hard object, or that when used as intended and sharpened regularly,
                reveal, as the outer hardened steel is removed by the sword polisher,
                low grade soft core, are not true Nippon To (Japanese sword).
                They do not deserve therefore to share the fine reputation established
                by the blades of the master smiths, that were produced using the
                traditional methods. These days, only Toyama, Ioriken and Nakamura
                schools actually perform tameshigiri (test cutting), and so only
                they understand the true method of using a sword.
              When the smoke cleared over the battlefield of Sekigahara
                at the conclusion of the bloody battle of 1600, the casualty count
                revealed an overwhelming victory for General Tokugawa Ieyasu,
                and the foundation was laid for a period of peace that would last
                almost three hundred years. In the two and a half centuries that
                followed, rarely was a sword drawn in anger and therefore th ere
                was no method other than cutting the bodies of dead criminals,
                by which to judge the cutting ability, as well as the strength
                of a sword. The wearing of swords was prohibited by the edict
                of 1876.
ere
                was no method other than cutting the bodies of dead criminals,
                by which to judge the cutting ability, as well as the strength
                of a sword. The wearing of swords was prohibited by the edict
                of 1876.
              Since interest in the martial art of Japan first
                developed in the West, it has always been assumed that the true
                art of swordsmanship died out around the time of the Meiji Restoration,
                or perhaps shortly afterwards when the wearing of swords by the
                Samurai was forbidden. Indeed, some historians would suggest that
                following the battle of Sekigahara in 1600, practical swordsmanship
                went into a decline during the peaceful Tokugawa years, from which
                it never recovered. The conclusion being therefore, that the art
                of practical swordsmanship died long before the late 19th century.
              Fortunately for this and future generations, neither
                is true. In 1875, as the Meiji era began and Japan stood on the
                threshold of its modern industrial future, the Toyama Gakko was
                established under the new order and proved subsequently to be
                just the vehicle to preserve and carry the age old art of swordsmanship
                into the twentieth century.
              Founded to train military personal in swordsmanship,
                as well as other military disciplines, it used as its basis for
                "Gunto Soho" or military sword method, the most effective
                techniques of the then living master swordsmen, all of witch were
                performed from a standing position. This combination of techniques
                from various old schools, notably the Omori Ryu, and their adoption
                by the army, led later to the foundation of the Toyama School
                of swordsmanship in 1925.
              Other schools of swordsmanship still in existence
                at the time of the Meiji Restoration, did not fare so well however.
                As the age of democracy dawned, training halls that had originally
                only taught the old methods to Samurai, turned to the mass market
                now afforded them to survive in the absence of their former patrons.
                By 1870, several well known dojo in Tokyo area, the Chiba, Saito
                and Asari training halls were teaching an easier less vigorous
                form of swordplay to their customers. Thus Kenjutsu for the Samurai,
                evolved into Kendo for the commoner, and as a result much that
                was good became lost.
              In the Spartan confines of military academies, Kenjutsu
                did however manage to survive. In the Rikugun Toyama Gakko both
                the techniques and the spirit of the Samurai were kept alive in
                the most practical way as in the 1943 publication; 2Japan Military
                Masters -"The Army i n
                Japanese Life". "From the point of view of the infantry,
                the Toyama School of Physical training, must be mentioned. Younger
                officers, particularly non-commissioned men and first and second
                lieutenants are chosen by their regimental commanders to attend.
                Instructions are given in different groups according to rank.
                Bayonet fighting, Japanese fencing, Ju-jutsu and Japanese wrestling
                are included in addition to the usual courses of physical training
                schools".
n
                Japanese Life". "From the point of view of the infantry,
                the Toyama School of Physical training, must be mentioned. Younger
                officers, particularly non-commissioned men and first and second
                lieutenants are chosen by their regimental commanders to attend.
                Instructions are given in different groups according to rank.
                Bayonet fighting, Japanese fencing, Ju-jutsu and Japanese wrestling
                are included in addition to the usual courses of physical training
                schools".
              For evidence of the practical effectiveness of the
                Toyama school sword techniques in particular, we have only to
                refer to an American publication entitled "The Jap Soldier",
                published in 1943 it would appear for the benefit of U.S. Army
                officers anticipating an encounter with their opposite numbers
                on the battlefield. It states; "Japanese officers still favour
                the old fashioned sword. You will see them leading their troops
                with swords waving, just as in old fashioned movie thrillers.
                Shoot these officers as quickly as you can, for those swords can
                slice a man from collar-bone to waist in a single clean slash".
              Until now, even in Japan, Toyama Ryu Batto Jutsu
                has remained little known outside of military circles. As a result
                it was able to avoid the pressure exerted by the occupying US
                forces at the end of the Second World War, in their effort to
                turn "unacceptable" martial arts into "acceptable"
                sports that the occidental mind could more easily understand.
                As such it has remained a practical and effective martial art.
                For those seeking the way of the Samurai, the path lies here.
                The techniques are combat effective, yet dignified; ruthlessly
                efficient yet graceful, we are indeed fortunate that they still
                exist. Unlike Kendo, the modern sportive form of Japanese fencing,
                or the companion art of sword drawing known as Iai-do, Batto Jutsu
                is the original art of unsheathing the incomparably sharp Japanese
                sabre, and in one continuously movement, cutting down an aggressor.
              The beauty of Toyama Ryu Batto Jutsu, lies in its
                Spartan simplicity and deadly effectiveness; devoid of artificial
                or theatrical postures, it is simply an efficient, practical and
                blindingly fast way of mortally wounding an opponent in a single
                decisive act of self defence. It's destructive power is devastating,
                as can be seen from the skilled swordsman's ability to cut cleanly
                through all manner of tough materials even iron and steel. This
                can only be learnt in a traditional school where the old methods,
                based on actual combat experience are still followed, and the
                true method of cutting therefore, fully understood. 
              http://www.buga.demon.co.uk/aikido/index-bh.html